On the current Kernels, i2c operations on disabled eDP panels don't
work because we don't enable the panel before doing the i2c
transactions. Whenever we try these transactions we print an error
message on dmesg and fail. The current test suite was trying to work
around this problem: we count how many eDP outputs we have and add
them to the final result.
Daniel asked me to not work around the bug, so now the i2c test will
fail until we actually fix the Kernel bug (or stop using eDP panels).
Signed-off-by: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
Looks like I forgot to push this chunk... The test was passing in
cases where you only have eDP monitors due to the fact that we
consider i2c won't work on eDP monitors.
Signed-off-by: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
- Use igt_require for magic SKIP results while still printing results
for all subtests.
- Wrap setup/teardown code outside of subtests with igt_fixture. This
will ensure that the so wrapped code isn't run when an
igt_require/igt_assert failed (and we're essentially just printing
the SKIP/FAIL result for all subtests) or when just enumerating
subtests.
- Use igt_exit. Otherwise SKIP/FAIL results of subtests won't be propagated
correctly.
- igt_subtest checks should be run unconditionally to make sure we
always enumerate the same set of subtests. A bit on the line here
since this is a subtest hidden behind a runtime flag.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
This test chekcs our code that enables Package C8+. The environment
requirements for this test are quite complicated:
- The machine needs to be properly configured to reach PC8+ when
possible, which means all the power management policies and device
drivers must be properly configured.
- You need at least one output connected.
- You need the /dev/cpu/0/msr file available.
- You need the /dev/i2c-* files available.
v2: - Many many changes due to the latest review comments and rebase.
Signed-off-by: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
It's not hitting a valid assertion that it tries to write an instruction
without a defined execution size (because the "default" exec_size never
end up being set).
Signed-off-by: Damien Lespiau <damien.lespiau@intel.com>
Same as:
commit 497814f2f2828efdc5bdd787ebc490d5083f61b8
Author: Damien Lespiau <damien.lespiau@intel.com>
Date: Tue Aug 20 14:52:05 2013 +0100
assembler: Revert "Automatically run all test cases."
make check will define srcdir and buildir variables for us.
This reverts commit 1c009349bc894bd195b5522540536898b0bee574.
The tests where supposed to be run through make check, not running the
"run-test.sh" standalone. So revert that patch to have make check work
as intended.
This reverts commit 6983eebf47f37def8f2315d5af1800b81644f240.
Exercise the eviction logic. This is just a naive test to ensure that we
can evict old buffers to accommodate new batches, and in the process
trigger the evict everything logic.
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Found the bug, but still only read the msr once every second - mainly as
an exercise in handling different sample rates.
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Not much point at the moment since we use forcewake to continuously
probe the GPU busyness. But that will eventually change to a more
power-efficient in-kernel.
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Apparently the simple changes introduced in
commit 78865847f9fae7e590960f9836f2ec8b611a190e
Author: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
AuthorDate: Mon Aug 19 07:23:49 2013 +0200
Commit: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
CommitDate: Mon Aug 19 08:09:25 2013 +0200
lib/drmtest: skip fixtures after an igt_skip
pushed the stack space requirement for run_modes over some magic limit
(I guess where the strack grow logic starts to fail, but I didn't
check). Fix this by moving the data into .bss.
Also add some asserts to check that fixtures aren't abused while at
it (i.e. the useful parts of my debug printf/assert craze).
Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=68299
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
And stop assigning colours beyond the end of the array. Still needs a
better method for colour assignment, big list of good colours & ida?
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
