Clear all the ioctl structs to zero before use as valgrind does not our
ioctls and so complains about undefined bytes being passed to syscalls.
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Actually only the igt_core was breaking the make distcheck,
but let's make it consistent and let the code cleaner.
Credits-to: Reviewed-by: Ben Widawsky <ben@bwidawsk.net>
Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@gmail.com>
errno is only valid after a syscall wrapper (e.g. ioctl()) reports an
error. However, we report the last errno value as a part of the
igt_assert() output and so we display spurious values such as:
Test requirement not met in function gem_require_ring, file ioctl_wrappers.c:802:
Last errno: 11, Resource temporarily unavailable
Test requirement: (!((((intel_get_drm_devid(fd)) == 0x0102 || ...
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
With the header cleanup we can now give this header a suitable name,
since it now really only contains register access and other I/O
functions and assorted definitions.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
I've left unistd.h in it - it's not strictly required but most users
of drmtest.h want it for the open helpers, and then you kinda need to
close that file descriptor again ...
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Only the igt core and non-test tools should have asserts to catch
internal errors, tests and helper libraries should all user igt_asert
instead.
Fix things up where assert instead of igt_assert was used.
One tiny step towards header sanity.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Also some tiny polish to function interface:
- @caching in gem_set_tiling should be uint32_t to match the ioctl
struct.
- s/size/length/ for gem_write/read.
- move gem_get_num_rings to the other ring feature helpers.
v2: Also demote gem_require_ring from static inline and move it, too.
v3: Also move gem_handle_to_libdrm_bo.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
I want to group the ioctl wrappers and related functions into their
own documentation section.
Apparently gtkdoc refuses to obey this wish without a corespdonding
header. So appease it. Also gtkdoc seems to struggle with rebuilding a
bit ...
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
