I've opted to not use the PIPE_CONTROL w/a for now. I am unclear if it
is actually required (the test does pass).
Signed-off-by: Ben Widawsky <ben@bwidawsk.net>
As these files are compiled for every test, the warnings cluttered
the Android build completely.
v2: As suggested by Daniel Vetter, drop some of the fixes and fix
the compilation flags instead.
Signed-off-by: Oscar Mateo <oscar.mateo@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
This provides a macro that allows us to update all the arbitrary blit
commands we have stuck throughout the code. It assumes we don't actually
use 64b relocs (which is currently true). This also allows us to easily find
all the areas we need to update later when we really use the upper dword.
This block was done mostly with a sed job, and represents the easier
in test blit implementations.
v2 by Oscar: s/OUT_BATCH/BEGIN_BATCH in BLIT_COPY_BATCH_START
CC: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Ben Widawsky <ben@bwidawsk.net>
Signed-off-by: Oscar Mateo <oscar.mateo@intel.com>
Needed by an upcoming patch fixing kms_render's blits for fbs that have
other than 32bpp formats.
Based on the corresponding SNA function.
v2:
- fix random ordering of src, dst parameters (Chris)
- pass pitch in bytes rather than pixels (Chris)
Signed-off-by: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
This wraps libdrm functionality to exec with contexts. This patch
shouldn't be applied until libdrm for contexts is updated.
Signed-off-by: Ben Widawsky <ben@bwidawsk.net>
Using BEGIN_BATCH can lead to a nice inf recursion through require_space
-> flush_batch -> BEGIN_BATCH.
Also fix things up to always require BATCH_RESERVED. We need 2 dwords
for the gen5 workaround and 2 dwords for MI_BB_END.
In this case, the code already has a comment about the problem. We don't
need to flood the build with this less than useful message.
Signed-off-by: Ben Widawsky <ben@bwidawsk.net>
After full-gtt, gem_tiled_blits doesn't allocate enough to force
eviction. So query the total aperture and accommodate.
Also introduce a similar test that utilizes fences rather than
use the BLT to perform the tiling and detiling.
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
A few of the tools can be performed post-mortem from a different system,
so it is useful to be able to compile those tools on those foreign
systems. Obviously, any program to interact with the PCI device or talk
to GEM will fail on a non-Intel system.
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
