Daniel Vetter 669a2fca6c tests/pm_rps: quiescent harder
Apparently some rps chips are prone to stick to max once you're there.
And all the synchronous waits in gem_quiescent_gpu are _really_ good
at forcing the kernel to go full throttle.

And even a positively tiny load (one MI_STORE_IMM per 50 ms) is enough
to eternally keeep it there, which means the first idle measurement of
the freqs before we do the reset it completely busted.

Just add a wait before the tricky test and call it a day.

Option b) would have been to now have this tiny load, but I think a
good reminder how quirky rps is is always welcome. Just in case we
start sleeping too easy at night.

Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=74956
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
2014-03-26 21:33:38 +01:00
..
2014-02-19 14:42:54 +00:00
2012-04-10 16:23:18 +02:00
2013-07-21 22:04:20 -07:00
2013-11-04 19:49:10 +01:00
2013-11-04 19:49:10 +01:00
2014-03-23 13:47:09 +01:00
2014-03-23 13:47:09 +01:00
2014-03-23 13:47:09 +01:00
2014-03-23 13:47:09 +01:00
2014-03-23 13:47:09 +01:00
2014-03-23 13:47:09 +01:00
2014-03-23 13:47:09 +01:00
2014-03-23 13:47:09 +01:00
2014-03-23 13:47:09 +01:00
2014-03-23 13:47:09 +01:00
2014-03-23 13:47:09 +01:00
2014-03-23 13:47:09 +01:00
2014-03-23 13:47:09 +01:00
2014-03-23 13:47:09 +01:00
2014-03-23 13:47:09 +01:00
2014-03-23 13:47:09 +01:00
2014-03-23 13:47:09 +01:00
2014-03-23 13:47:09 +01:00
2013-11-01 22:18:20 +01:00
2014-03-21 16:25:37 +01:00
2014-03-26 21:33:38 +01:00
2013-11-01 21:10:59 +01:00
2013-07-21 22:04:20 -07:00
2012-01-15 16:05:43 +01:00