17 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Chris Wilson
55b8c33ca5 overlay: Auatomatically mount debugfs
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
2013-08-19 18:16:11 +01:00
Daniel Vetter
90ef68859c test/gem_dummy_reloc_loop: fix igt_require conversion
Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=68170
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
2013-08-18 19:58:28 +02:00
Daniel Vetter
b3880d3a96 tests: roll out igt_fixture
Also sprinkle igt_assert and igt_require over the setup code to clean
up code while at it. To avoid gcc getting upset about unitialized
variables just move them out of main as global data (where they always
get initialized to 0) - gcc can't see through our igt_fixture and
igt_subtest maze properly.

Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
2013-08-14 18:02:46 +02:00
Daniel Vetter
1532af19d9 tests/gem_dummy_reloc_loop: use igt_skip
For tests with subtest we should use igt_skip to ensure that subtests
are always properly enumerated.

Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
2013-08-14 12:17:51 +02:00
Daniel Vetter
8f5387eb99 tests: introduce igt_require
Since igt_skip has funny control flow we can abuse it and make it work
like a special kind of assert which automatically skips tests if a
requirement fails.

Note that in places where we have a less strict test which should
always succeed (e.g. ioctl works or isn't available) the igt_assert
should be place before the igt_require with the more strict
requirements. Otherwise we'll skip a test instead of properly failing
it.

Convert a few users of igt_skip over to igt_require to showcase its
use.

v2: s/gem_check_/gem_require_/ so that we consistently use "require"
to indicate magic check that can call igt_skip. Imo hiding the
igt_require for feature checks is ok, but for more traditional assert
like use cases an explicit igt_require might be better.

Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
2013-08-13 15:15:18 +02:00
Daniel Vetter
5e25fcc285 tests: use igt_fail instead of exit(param != 0)
Mostly a sed job with too manual fixups:
- one case of using _exit instead of exit
- and one case which under some conditions use 77, so convert that
  check to an igt_skip.

Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
2013-08-13 15:15:17 +02:00
Daniel Vetter
83440953e5 tests: s/assert/igt_assert
Just a wholesale rollout for now, we can refine later on.

Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
2013-08-13 15:07:44 +02:00
Daniel Vetter
6877877558 tests: s/return igt_retval();/igt_exit();/
Requested-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
2013-08-12 12:26:35 +02:00
Daniel Vetter
1caaf0a6b6 s/drmtest_/igt_/
Requested-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Acked-by: Damien Lespiau <damien.lespiau@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
2013-08-12 12:20:22 +02:00
Daniel Vetter
814b135541 s/drmtest_subtest_block/drmtest_subtest/
The _block postfix meant to convey that a C statement/block must
follow can be misread as the verb to block. So drop it.

Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
2013-08-12 12:15:16 +02:00
Daniel Vetter
7847ea2965 tests: use drmtest_skip to check for rings
To simplify things add a set of gem_check_<ring> functions which take
care of this. Since I've opted for static inlines drmtest.h grew a few
more header includes which was a neat opportunity to dump a few redundant
#defines.

This kills all the skipped_all hand-rolled logic we have.

Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
2013-08-12 11:17:58 +02:00
Daniel Vetter
9f6365e4ea lib/drmtest: Add drmtest_subtest_block macro
Doesn't do more than an if (drmtest_run_test(name)) right now, but
as soon as we get a bit of infrastructure to handle test failures and
skipping, this will get more interesting.

Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
2013-08-12 11:10:26 +02:00
Damien Lespiau
5fa15f79d0 tests: Black list tests we don't want to run on simulation
Let's start by a small set of tests, to eventually consider running
more.

The current list should then be:

gem_mmap
gem_pread_after_blit
gem_ring_sync_loop
gem_ctx_basic
gem_pipe_control_store_loop
gem_storedw_loop_render
gem_storedw_loop_blt
gem_storedw_loop_bsd
gem_render_linear_blits
gem_tiled_blits
gem_cpu_reloc

gem_exec_nop
gem_mmap_gtt

v2 add (Daniel Vetter)
gem_exec_bad_domains
gem_exec_faulting_reloc
gem_flink
gem_reg_read
gem_reloc_overflow
gem_tiling_max_stride
prime_*

Signed-off-by: Damien Lespiau <damien.lespiau@intel.com>
2013-07-18 15:49:02 +01:00
Zhong Li
a417ef7cc8 i-g-t: gem_dummy_reloc_loop.c: add vebox test case
Aside from adding VEBOX support, this test allows allows the "mixed"
test case variant to work on platforms that have 2 rings which was
previously not the case. To the best of my memory, this might therefore
impact G45, and Ironlake.

Signed-off-by: Zhong Li <zhong.li@intel.com>
[Ben: added commit message, remove num_rings = 1, s/LOCACL/LOCAL]
Signed-off-by: Ben Widawsky <ben@bwidawsk.net>
2013-05-03 17:53:57 -07:00
Daniel Vetter
53e184b228 tests/gem_dummy_reloc_loop: some updates
- convert to subtests
- shut up stderr output for successful runs

Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
2012-12-05 10:18:03 +01:00
Daniel Vetter
19d69955d2 tests: exit(77) to properly mark tests as SKIP
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
2011-09-13 11:05:13 +02:00
Daniel Vetter
61b9806f4e tests: basic ring<->cpu and ring<->ring tests
Using a dummy reloc that doesn't matter to trick the kernel into
synchroizing the rings.

v2: properly apply MI_NOOP workaround to MI_FLUSH_DW and
switch to MI_COND_BATCH_BUFFER_END as a dummy command on the
render ring to avoid PIPE_CONTROL errata.

v3: somebody clever decided that in C, you cound from 1,
i.e. I915_EXEC_RENDER == 1. It works now ...

Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
2011-09-12 09:39:16 +02:00