sysfs interface for rc6 has been changed to only expose deep RC6 file to the platorms
that really support them, aka SNB and IVB.
So let's split this test and only test RC6p and RC6pp on these platforms.
Reference: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=84886
Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Combine two subtests(rc6_residency_check and rc6_residency_counter)
into one subtest(residency_accuracy)
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
New stuff caught.
Plus manually simplify the massive igt_fail_on_f(file == NULL, ...) to
a simple igt_assert(file). We already print the errno (if
applicapable) and the condition, which is equally informative.
Cc: Yi Sun <yi.sun@intel.com>
Cc: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
Cc: Wendy Wang <wendy.wang@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Why need add rc6_residency_counter subtest case:
RC6 feature support residency counter,from power consumption aspect,
the counter closer to 1,the better.If the counter is < 0.9, the residency
is not good and will impact power consumption value, if the counter is > 1,
sysfs file is inaccurate.
Attach the test result message:
root@x-bdw05:/GFX/Test/Intel_gpu_tools/intel-gpu-tools/tests# ./pm_rc6_residency
IGT-Version: 1.6-g9a70e29 (x86_64) (Linux: 3.15.0-rc7_drm-intel-nightly_0a37b5_20140604+ x86_64)
Subtest rc6-residency-check: SUCCESS
This machine doesn't support rc6pp
This machine doesn't support rc6p
The residency counter : 0.987000
This machine entry rc6 state.
Subtest rc6-residency-counter: SUCCESS
root@x-bdw05:/GFX/Test/Intel_gpu_tools/intel-gpu-tools/tests# ./pm_rc6_residency --run-subtest rc6-residency-counter
IGT-Version: 1.6-g9a70e29 (x86_64) (Linux: 3.15.0-rc7_drm-intel-nightly_0a37b5_20140604+ x86_64)
This machine doesn't support rc6pp
This machine doesn't support rc6p
The residency counter : 0.987000
This machine entry rc6 state.
Subtest rc6-residency-counter: SUCCESS
root@x-bdw05:/GFX/Test/Intel_gpu_tools/intel-gpu-tools/tests# ./pm_rc6_residency --run-subtest rc6-residency-check
IGT-Version: 1.6-g9a70e29 (x86_64) (Linux: 3.15.0-rc7_drm-intel-nightly_0a37b5_20140604+ x86_64)
Subtest rc6-residency-check: SUCCESS
root@x-bdw05:/GFX/Test/Intel_gpu_tools/intel-gpu-tools/tests# ./pm_rc6_residency --list
rc6-residency-check
rc6-residency-counter
Run as non-root
[haha@x-pk home]$ ./pm_rc6_residency
IGT-Version: 1.6-g18d2130 (x86_64) (Linux: 3.13.0-rc3_drm-intel-nightly_639e4d_20131210+ x86_64)
No intel gpu found
Subtest rc6-residency-check: SKIP
Subtest rc6-residency-counter: SKIP
Run on non-intel platform
[root@x-pk5 home]# ./pm_rc6_residency
IGT-Version: 1.6-g18d2130 (x86_64) (Linux: 3.13.0-rc3_drm-intel-nightly_639e4d_20131210+ x86_64)
Test requirement not met in function read_rc6_residency, file pm_rc6_residency.c:77:
Last errno: 2, No such file or directory
Test requirement: (!(file))
Subtest rc6-residency-check: SKIP
Subtest rc6-residency-counter: SKIP
Signed-off-by: Wendy Wang <wendy.wang@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
This reverts commit 35554a1bcaaea55c1cfa88c0176c58d2fb3b8013.
Apparently people are too unhappy with this.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
This reverts commit 9a70e29f8380c2fc6f9b43757c68e24bf2619061.
Patch needs polish and after a quick irc discussion Ben&I agreed that
the revert is in order.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Move rc6_residency_check to subtest, add new rc6_residency_counter subtest
for pm_rc6_residency IGT case.
Test results run on platforms show as below:
On HSW
---------------------------------------
[root@x-hswu opt]# ./pm_rc6_residency
IGT-Version: 1.6-g35b31df (x86_64) (Linux: 3.15.0-rc3_drm-intel-nightly_0791a3_20140520+ x86_64)
Subtest rc6-residency-check: SUCCESS
This machine doesn't support rc6pp
This machine doesn't support rc6p
This machine entry rc6 status.
The residency counter : 0.999667
Subtest rc6-residency-counter: SUCCESS
On IVB
----------------------------------------
[root@IVB tests]# ./pm_rc6_residency
IGT-Version: 1.6-g35b31df (x86_64) (Linux: 3.13.6_20140318+ x86_64)
Subtest rc6-residency-check: SUCCESS
This machine entry rc6p status.
The residency counter : 0.997000
Subtest rc6-residency-counter: SUCCESS
On BYT
----------------------------------------
root@x-byt:/opt# ./pm_rc6_residency
IGT-Version: 1.6-g0d39021 (x86_64) (Linux: 3.14.0_kcloud_ceabbb_20140521+ x86_64)
Subtest rc6-residency-check: SUCCESS
This machine doesn't support rc6pp
This machine doesn't support rc6p
The residency counter : 1.144333
Test assertion failure function rc6_residency_counter, file pm_rc6_residency.c:131:
Last errno: 0, Success
Failed assertion: counter_result <=1
Debug files must be wrong,
Subtest rc6-residency-counter: FAIL
On BDW
---------------------------------------
[root@x-bdw01 opt]# ./pm_rc6_residency
IGT-Version: 1.6-g0d39021 (x86_64) (Linux: 3.15.0-rc5_drm-intel-nightly_367653_20140521+ x86_64)
Subtest rc6-residency-check: SUCCESS
This machine doesn't support rc6pp
This machine doesn't support rc6p
The residency counter : 0.994333
This machine entry rc6 state.
Subtest rc6-residency-counter: SUCCESS
Signed-off-by: Liu, Lei A <lei.a.liu@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Wendy Wang <wendy.wang@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ben Widawsky <benjamin.widawsky@intel.com>
Often just folding together of the common if (cond) printf;
abort|igt_skip|igt_fail; pattern. But in a few cases I've ripped out
more since the igt macros will already print the condition and errno.
A few tests where more work (like ripping out return codes en masse)
is needed left as-is.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
I've left unistd.h in it - it's not strictly required but most users
of drmtest.h want it for the open helpers, and then you kinda need to
close that file descriptor again ...
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Imo power management, power consumption and performance are tightly
enough coupled that we can throw them all into one bin.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
