With the header cleanup we can now give this header a suitable name,
since it now really only contains register access and other I/O
functions and assorted definitions.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
This provides a macro that allows us to update all the arbitrary blit
commands we have stuck throughout the code. It assumes we don't actually
use 64b relocs (which is currently true). This also allows us to easily find
all the areas we need to update later when we really use the upper dword.
This block was done mostly with a sed job, and represents the easier
in test blit implementations.
v2 by Oscar: s/OUT_BATCH/BEGIN_BATCH in BLIT_COPY_BATCH_START
CC: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Ben Widawsky <ben@bwidawsk.net>
Signed-off-by: Oscar Mateo <oscar.mateo@intel.com>
With the new _f variants we can replace almost all of them.
Also remove a ton of checks for argc != 1, they're a bit useless ...
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Mostly a sed job with too manual fixups:
- one case of using _exit instead of exit
- and one case which under some conditions use 77, so convert that
check to an igt_skip.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Requested-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Acked-by: Damien Lespiau <damien.lespiau@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Let's start by a small set of tests, to eventually consider running
more.
The current list should then be:
gem_mmap
gem_pread_after_blit
gem_ring_sync_loop
gem_ctx_basic
gem_pipe_control_store_loop
gem_storedw_loop_render
gem_storedw_loop_blt
gem_storedw_loop_bsd
gem_render_linear_blits
gem_tiled_blits
gem_cpu_reloc
gem_exec_nop
gem_mmap_gtt
v2 add (Daniel Vetter)
gem_exec_bad_domains
gem_exec_faulting_reloc
gem_flink
gem_reg_read
gem_reloc_overflow
gem_tiling_max_stride
prime_*
Signed-off-by: Damien Lespiau <damien.lespiau@intel.com>
The crucial trick to reproduce the bug is that we need to have
a decent pile of active bos to retire. Because we unref the bo
after having it moved off the active list, our recursion depth
in fdo bug #42180 is limited by the number of active objects that
can retire at the same time.
Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=42180
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
