Also sprinkle igt_assert and igt_require over the setup code to clean
up code while at it. To avoid gcc getting upset about unitialized
variables just move them out of main as global data (where they always
get initialized to 0) - gcc can't see through our igt_fixture and
igt_subtest maze properly.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Useful when stitching together combinatorial testnames.
v2:
- ## rules are just fun. We need 2 indirections to actually get
__LINE__ to properly expand.
- Kill stray ; which botched the logic.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
An oversight in the mass conversion to the new framework as the test was
called from two locations.
Ideally, the checks could be moved back to the caller and the framework
still work. This is just the patch of least resistence.
Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=68091
Since igt_skip has funny control flow we can abuse it and make it work
like a special kind of assert which automatically skips tests if a
requirement fails.
Note that in places where we have a less strict test which should
always succeed (e.g. ioctl works or isn't available) the igt_assert
should be place before the igt_require with the more strict
requirements. Otherwise we'll skip a test instead of properly failing
it.
Convert a few users of igt_skip over to igt_require to showcase its
use.
v2: s/gem_check_/gem_require_/ so that we consistently use "require"
to indicate magic check that can call igt_skip. Imo hiding the
igt_require for feature checks is ok, but for more traditional assert
like use cases an explicit igt_require might be better.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Mostly a sed job with too manual fixups:
- one case of using _exit instead of exit
- and one case which under some conditions use 77, so convert that
check to an igt_skip.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Requested-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Acked-by: Damien Lespiau <damien.lespiau@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
The _block postfix meant to convey that a C statement/block must
follow can be misread as the verb to block. So drop it.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
To simplify things add a set of gem_check_<ring> functions which take
care of this. Since I've opted for static inlines drmtest.h grew a few
more header includes which was a neat opportunity to dump a few redundant
#defines.
This kills all the skipped_all hand-rolled logic we have.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Doesn't do more than an if (drmtest_run_test(name)) right now, but
as soon as we get a bit of infrastructure to handle test failures and
skipping, this will get more interesting.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Let's start by a small set of tests, to eventually consider running
more.
The current list should then be:
gem_mmap
gem_pread_after_blit
gem_ring_sync_loop
gem_ctx_basic
gem_pipe_control_store_loop
gem_storedw_loop_render
gem_storedw_loop_blt
gem_storedw_loop_bsd
gem_render_linear_blits
gem_tiled_blits
gem_cpu_reloc
gem_exec_nop
gem_mmap_gtt
v2 add (Daniel Vetter)
gem_exec_bad_domains
gem_exec_faulting_reloc
gem_flink
gem_reg_read
gem_reloc_overflow
gem_tiling_max_stride
prime_*
Signed-off-by: Damien Lespiau <damien.lespiau@intel.com>
