This has the upside that we'll never forget to add it to thrashing
tests. But we'll also never miss to move it when adding basic
functionality tests to existing binaries. Chris already started this
refining work in e.g.
commit d77eda6614a1955717f224be023dedf74eb7735d
Author: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Date: Fri Nov 14 07:45:40 2014 +0000
igt/gem_linear_blits: Require that we do the full test
by moving igt_skip_on_simulation into subtests.
Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@intel.com>
More in line with the usual igt pattern and simplifies the code -
every called just wrapped it in igt_require.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@intel.com>
We actually allocate twice as many bo as needed to fill the aperture to
cause ENOSPC, but the entire payload has to still fit into RAM.
Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=75138
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
And shovel all the various helpers in there.
Also move igt_set_vt_graphics_mode to igt_kms.h since the function is
implemented in igt_kms.c. And it fits better. I kinda missed this in
the prep work.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Ensure sub-tests can be listed correctly by doing any test setup within
an igt_fixture block.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Wood <thomas.wood@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
In the past new testcases with subtest often forgot to add the call to
igt_exit at the end of their main() function. That is now caught with
a bit more obnoxious asserts, but it's still a nuissance.
This little igt_main macro takes care of that (and also of calling the
subtest machinery initialization code correctly).
If no one objects I'll roll this out for all the simple cases (i.e.
those tests that don't have additional argv parsing on top of the
subtest machinery).
v2: Roll it out across the board.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
This turned out to be the reason one one of my tests was hitting
the list corruption bug - we need a good deal more memory pressure.
So I'll now add a new testcase for that.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Also I've stumbled over igt_fixture again. Somehow gcc loves to wreak
havoc with stack variables set up in igt_fixtures ... Duct-tape in the
form of moving fd out to global scope applied.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
