4 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Chris Wilson
f1e9e300fa gem_lut_handle: Make the error checking explicit for LUT handling
What this test is interested in is the handling of the LUT for very
large arrays, irrespective of whether such batch are actually
executable. So adjust the pass/fail checks to be explicit in the error
they are looking for, so that we do not conflate memory/aperture
pressure as a failure in the LUT API.

Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=65391
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
2013-06-05 11:14:25 +01:00
Chris Wilson
fb7bc2e8d1 tests/gem_lut_handle: Limit testing LUT interface to recent kernels
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
2013-01-17 15:10:29 +00:00
Chris Wilson
d5517a1301 tests/gem_lut_handle: Expand negative testing
Pass in lots of execs and relocs trying to trick the kernel into making
a mistake.

Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
2013-01-17 15:05:20 +00:00
Chris Wilson
ec2eac6d7b tests: Exercise new API for using a LUT with the execbuffer
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
2013-01-17 14:30:43 +00:00