From aa4ff912e3a7a84adcfc6bde9f6f2e9a4a1aaf82 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Daniel Vetter Date: Wed, 27 Nov 2013 11:14:19 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] tests: Document per-ring naming conventions Inspired by the recent pile of tests for the CS, which doesn't split up the tests into per-ring subtests. Cc: bradley.d.volkin@intel.com Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter --- tests/NAMING-CONVENTION | 4 ++++ 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+) diff --git a/tests/NAMING-CONVENTION b/tests/NAMING-CONVENTION index f08e2828..8fc6548d 100644 --- a/tests/NAMING-CONVENTION +++ b/tests/NAMING-CONVENTION @@ -61,3 +61,7 @@ machine isn't configured properly there should be a first subtest to just check for that. ctx: Tests that exercise the hw context support. + +render/blt/bsd/vebox: Tests which apply to individual rings should use these +suffixes. They're a bit inconsistent and historically grown, but they new Bspec +names (RCS, BCS, VCS and VECS) aren't really clearer.