From 9c675f05b6100b21a81b55a8e6db281d49f5fccf Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Javier Vargas Date: Wed, 23 Jun 2021 17:38:09 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] Fix Link 8.2 to 10.2 08_2_Building_the_Structure_of_P2SH.md 404 error --- 09_2_Running_a_Bitcoin_Script.md | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/09_2_Running_a_Bitcoin_Script.md b/09_2_Running_a_Bitcoin_Script.md index 67b3098..85cd0fd 100644 --- a/09_2_Running_a_Bitcoin_Script.md +++ b/09_2_Running_a_Bitcoin_Script.md @@ -12,7 +12,7 @@ Bitcoin Scripts are run from left to right. That sounds easy enough, because it' For example, if you were adding together "1" and "2", your Bitcoin Script for that would be `1 2 OP_ADD`, _not_ "1 + 2". Since we know that OP_ADD operator takes two inputs, we know that the two inputs before it are its operands. -> :warning: **WARNING:** Technically, everything in Bitcoin Script is an opcode, thus it would be most appropriate to record the above example as `OP_1 OP_2 OP_ADD`. In our examples, we don't worry about how the constants will be evaluated, as that's a topic of translation, as is explained in [§8.2: Building the Structure of P2SH](08_2_Building_the_Structure_of_P2SH.md). Some writers prefer to also leave the "OP" prefix off all operators, but we have opted not to. +> :warning: **WARNING:** Technically, everything in Bitcoin Script is an opcode, thus it would be most appropriate to record the above example as `OP_1 OP_2 OP_ADD`. In our examples, we don't worry about how the constants will be evaluated, as that's a topic of translation, as is explained in [§8.2: Building the Structure of P2SH](10_2_Building_the_Structure_of_P2SH.md). Some writers prefer to also leave the "OP" prefix off all operators, but we have opted not to. ### Understand the Stack