mirror of
				https://github.com/ChristopherA/Learning-Bitcoin-from-the-Command-Line.git
				synced 2025-10-30 18:07:22 +00:00 
			
		
		
		
	Correct syntax error
The question feels odd using the `What` question word and the following paragraph fits better with the `Why` question word.
This commit is contained in:
		
							parent
							
								
									57cf4e7600
								
							
						
					
					
						commit
						92f86fa393
					
				| @ -96,7 +96,7 @@ script                                   |                                   sta | |||||||
| ``` | ``` | ||||||
| Bitcoin Scripts are considered successful if there's something in the Stack, and it's non-zero, so SegWit scripts automatically succeed on old nodes as long as the `scriptPubKey` is correctly created with a non-zero pub-key hash. This is called an "anyone-can-spend" transaction, because old nodes verified them as correct without any need for signatures. | Bitcoin Scripts are considered successful if there's something in the Stack, and it's non-zero, so SegWit scripts automatically succeed on old nodes as long as the `scriptPubKey` is correctly created with a non-zero pub-key hash. This is called an "anyone-can-spend" transaction, because old nodes verified them as correct without any need for signatures. | ||||||
| 
 | 
 | ||||||
| > :book: ***What can't old nodes steal SegWit UTXOs?*** SegWit was enabled on the Bitcoin network when 95% of miners signalled that they were ready to start using it. That means that only 5% of nodes at that point might have registered anyone-can-spend SegWit transactions as valid without going through the proper work of checking the `txinwitness`. If they incorrectly incorporated an invalid anyone-can-spend UTXO into a block, the other 95% of nodes would refuse to validate that block, and so it would quickly be orphaned rather than being added to the "main" blockchain. (Certainly, 51% of nodes could choose to stop interpreting SegWit transactions correctly, but 51% of nodes can do anything on a consensus network like a blockchain.) | > :book: ***Why can't old nodes steal SegWit UTXOs?*** SegWit was enabled on the Bitcoin network when 95% of miners signalled that they were ready to start using it. That means that only 5% of nodes at that point might have registered anyone-can-spend SegWit transactions as valid without going through the proper work of checking the `txinwitness`. If they incorrectly incorporated an invalid anyone-can-spend UTXO into a block, the other 95% of nodes would refuse to validate that block, and so it would quickly be orphaned rather than being added to the "main" blockchain. (Certainly, 51% of nodes could choose to stop interpreting SegWit transactions correctly, but 51% of nodes can do anything on a consensus network like a blockchain.) | ||||||
| 
 | 
 | ||||||
| Because old nodes always see SegWit scripts as correct, they will always verify them, even without understanding their content. | Because old nodes always see SegWit scripts as correct, they will always verify them, even without understanding their content. | ||||||
| 
 | 
 | ||||||
|  | |||||||
		Loading…
	
	
			
			x
			
			
		
	
		Reference in New Issue
	
	Block a user