This commit is contained in:
Shannon Appelcline 2020-07-14 12:55:54 -10:00 committed by GitHub
parent 22c15b3670
commit 58d911c1ad
No known key found for this signature in database
GPG Key ID: 4AEE18F83AFDEB23

View File

@ -14,9 +14,18 @@ If you've got a pruned node (and you probably do), you'll instead need to tell i
``` ```
$ bitcoin-cli -named importaddress address=2NAGfA4nW6nrZkD5je8tSiAcYB9xL2xYMCz rescan="false" $ bitcoin-cli -named importaddress address=2NAGfA4nW6nrZkD5je8tSiAcYB9xL2xYMCz rescan="false"
``` ```
If you prefer, you can import the address using its descriptor (and this is generally the better, more standardized answer):
```
$ bitcoin-cli importmulti '[{"desc": "sh(multi(2,02da2f10746e9778dd57bd0276a4f84101c4e0a711f9cfd9f09cde55acbdd2d191,02bfde48be4aa8f4bf76c570e98a8d287f9be5638412ab38dede8e78df82f33fa3))#0pazcr4y", "timestamp": "now", "watchonly": true}]'
[
{
"success": true
}
]
```
Afterward the funds should show up when you `listunspent` ... but they still aren't easily spendable. (In fact, your wallet may claim they're not `spendable` at all!) Afterward the funds should show up when you `listunspent` ... but they still aren't easily spendable. (In fact, your wallet may claim they're not `spendable` at all!)
If you're not able to incorporate the address into your wallet due to pruning, using `gettransaction` to get info instead (or look on a block explorer). If for some reason you're not able to incorporate the address into your wallet, you can use `gettransaction` to get info instead (or look at a block explorer).
``` ```
$ bitcoin-cli -named gettransaction txid=b164388854f9701051809eed166d9f6cedba92327e4296bf8a265a5da94f6521 verbose=true $ bitcoin-cli -named gettransaction txid=b164388854f9701051809eed166d9f6cedba92327e4296bf8a265a5da94f6521 verbose=true
{ {
@ -166,7 +175,7 @@ machine1$ bitcoin-cli -named signrawtransactionwithkey hexstring=$rawtxhex prevt
} }
``` ```
That produces scary errors and says that it's not `failing`. This is all correct. You can see that the signature has been partially successfully because the `hex` has gotten longer. Though the transaction has been partially signed, it's not done because it needs more signatures. That produces scary errors and says that it's `failing`. This is all fine. You can see that the signature has been partially successfully because the `hex` has gotten longer. Though the transaction has been partially signed, it's not done because it needs more signatures.
### Repeat for Other Signers ### Repeat for Other Signers